Is fantasizing more beneficial than putting something into physical form? De Agostini/Getty Images Inc. This year, OpenAI – an esteemed AI research facility – has presented their text creator “ChatGPT” along with an image producer, “DALL-E 2.” Despite the colossal advances made in speech comprehension and image creation through the use of technological programs, there is an element of uneasiness surrounding them. Not a few people are sad about the possible fading of the college essay and some are even claiming that the art world is deceased. However, one has to further question the amount that this technology may be hindering originality. No matter what, somebody has to provide a description of the job to be accomplished for the technology in order to make a picture or compose an essay. It is imperative to be highly descriptive when crafting a product so that the results are as accurate and precise as possible. After the results are generated, a human may need to adjust the product slightly, such as altering the artwork, reworking the text, or directing the technology to create something different that meets new requirements. We believe that attempting to draw a line between the planning and implementation of an idea is an unattainable goal. It is impossible to distinguish between the idea and its execution. It is through the hard work and dedication to perfecting a concept into a reality that provides real worth, not solely coming up with the idea itself. The significance of artistic works extends beyond the final product, but also to the journey taken by the artist to create it – the process of struggle, exploration and mastery of the task that leads to the outcome. People often become preoccupied with the idea behind the artwork and admire the inventive process. When it comes to literature, authors write and revise the chapters of their books.
